3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Legal advertisement. ) (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. ) You are using an outdated browser. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). ) 9 DANIEL ANTHONY LEYVA, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9:11-13.) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. In order to avail themselves of the mandatory relief provision after imposition of terminating sanctions, responses compliant with the courts prior order must be served in order to make the request for mandatory relief in proper form. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 A petition for coordination and other required documents are submitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council at the following address: Chair, Judicial Council of California. 5 Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). Ct. (Marshalls of CA, LLC) (2017) 3 Cal. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). In a demurrer proceeding, the defects must be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. ) ) Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Demurrer is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 Court Clerk 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. The Hon. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) ) 5 The Court will be transitioning to Zoom for all remote appearances. CCP 396b(a), 397(a). ) When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. ) Fraud means an intentional misrepresentation, deceit, or concealment of a material fact known to the defendant with the intention on the part of the defendant of thereby depriving a person of property or legal rights or otherwise causing injury. 7. 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. 9 JONATHAN TRAWINSKI, ) Department: 404 See Taylor, supra, 24 Cal.3d at 893 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant repeatedly drove under the influence, had convictions for drunk driving, and had previously caused accidents while intoxicated); see also Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 (punitive damages was adequately plead where defendant drove while intoxicated, speeding into a crowded intersection at 65 mph in a 35 mph zone, and attempted to mislead officers as to whether or not he was driving). Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) 11 ) 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. ) SFPKOA filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022. The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates San Francisco County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). ) Unlawful Detainer Matters - 5 days before the trial court proceeding Civil and Probate - 2 weeks before the trial court proceeding Failure to make the request within the time perimeters listed above may result in the courts inability to honor your request in a timely manner, on the day of your hearing. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 ( Cal. Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 11 ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. ) 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT B. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-347246 5 ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 5 Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. South San Francisco, CA 94080 . The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Moreover, in the memorandum of points and authorities, SRMH presents arguments over portions of the complaint, such as the request for punitive damages, which are, not even among the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). He claims that Defendants negligently or intentionally disregarded signs of a stroke or other serious problem, either due to negligence or intentionally in order to avoid further treating Plaintiff because he was a recipient of Medi-Cal. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 6 TESSA LUU, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (SKF Farms v. Superior Court (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 902, 905.) 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 ) Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. ) (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. Prac. ) As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The motion currently on the Courts calendar is hereby vacated to be re-set upon assignment to a Department which may hear the case. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from San Francisco County Superior. will be able to access it on trellis. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) ) San Francisco, CA 94102 You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil department. ) 11 ) ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 . (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). 5 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. Department 405 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . Court Clerk Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. ) Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. Time of Hearing All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. ) ) This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. (Central Pathology Service Med. The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . ) . 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 ) It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 ) ) A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 ) Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. 11 ) 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. ) Importantly, the burden is on the moving party to show that venue is not proper in the county where the action was filed and that venue is proper in the county to which defendant wishes to transfer the action. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Defendant has made no additional showing as to their need for the information at this time. Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. ) 11 ) ) I like all the marble too. As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 5 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. If in paper form, the authority must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). 13 TENTATIVE RULING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 His life and legacy. ) (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 ) ) However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. ) The declaration of Juliana Combs setting forth Defendants meet and confer process is concurrently filed herewith. (Amended Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Demurrer (MP&A) p. 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, V 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Proc. Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. 11 ) In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Leach v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 906; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405. A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. 5 Retired President of the San Francisco Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. ) 9 MOHAMMAD DAGHIGHI, ) Department: 404 ) Therefore, Plaintiffs request for $1,500 in sanctions is appropriate and GRANTED. ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 6 MICHAEL JOHN NAPOLITANA, ) Case Number: FDI-18-790530 Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. 12 ) Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8]. See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. ) See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) 13 TENTATIVE RULING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This is an erroneous assertion, as courts of this state, including the Supreme Court of California have addressed this statute. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. See CCP 437. Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). Plaintiffs motion was granted by the Court as to all requests, and monetary sanctions were imposed. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 ) Print | E-mail ) 11 ) 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING Accordingly, the complaint is judicially noticeable, although the court may not judicially notice the truth of assertions made in the complaint. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ. In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) (CCP) 435. San Francisco, CA 94102 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. ) 11 ) (See CCP 430.10(e).) ) ) 5 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 5 2 Civic Center Courthouse ) ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Maria E. Evangelista See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. San Francisco, CA 94102 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. 908.) Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. ) Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds.
Westchester Medical Center Revenue,
Peoria County Court Records Smart Search,
Leander Isd Fine Arts Director,
Articles S